European Partnership Help Center
Welcome to the ERA-LEARN Help Center for European Partnerships. Here you will find a collection of frequently asked questions and answers from our webinars and events. More questions and answers will be added over time. If you have any partnership related questions, please send them to office@era-learn.eu and we will add them to the Help Center.
-
What is meant by policy assumptions? How can partnershps anticipate the policy by 2033, when the partnership ends?
“Policy assumptions” refer to the underlying policy conditions or trends your scenarios are built on: for example, the continuing relevance of a thematic area, emerging EU priorities, or evolving regulatory contexts. These assumptions help make scenarios realistic and coherent with likely policy developments, without requiring you to predict them. They should be transparent and updated as the policy landscape evolves.
-
What are the European Commission's recommendations on the use of AI tools in proposals and assessments?
There are no restrictions in AI use in proposal preparation, however, applicants take full responsibility for the contents of the proposal, and are expected to check and ensure that there are no errors introduced due to AI use. Applicants can use AI to prepare a proposal, but expert evaluators may not use such tools when evaluating a proposal.
-
Which organisations are eligible to become beneficiaries of co-funded partnerships? What criteria must beneficiaries meet to participate in partnerships? For example, are EU member state organisations eligible, or are there other geographical criteria? What about organisation types, e.g. private or public?
The Horizon Europe Regulation (Art. 2(36)) states that programme co-fund actions are implemented by “legal entities managing or funding R&I programmes,” so any legal entity that is eligible for funding may become a beneficiary of a programme co-fund action implementing a co-funded partnership. Which countries are eligible for funding is described in Annex B of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes. Specific eligibility conditions may be included in the respective call text. However, in co-funded partnerships, national/regional funding bodies/agencies and ministries are usually acting as the core group of beneficiaries, but research performing organisation and private organisations might also be involved in the consortium. The important point is that the consortium is able to implement the work as proposed under the partnership. Information on organisations involved in existing co-funded partnerships can be found in the ERA LEARN database.
-
What is the difference between co-funded and institutionalised partnerships?
The key difference lies in the implementation structure. Institutionalised , or treaty-based partnerships, are implemented through dedicated bodies (for example, Joint Undertakings) with a deeper level of integration and a distinct legal basis (Art. 185/187 of TFEU and the EIT legal acts for 2021-2027). Partnerships under Art. 185 involve public-public networks with Member States and Associated States leading the partnership, while Art. 187 allows networks to partner up with both the private sector (e.g. industry associations) and public partners (such as the Chips Joint Undertaking). Co-funded partnerships , on the other hand, are established through a Grant Agreement between a consortium of partners and the EU, following the successful submission of a proposal under a Horizon Europe Work Programme topic.
-
Given the fact that we are now committed to release the phasing out strategy would the biennial monitoring report be relaxed or delayed?
This exercise of phasing-out strategies does not impact the reporting requirements for the biennial monitoring reports
-
The timeline for December is indeed short, also because we would have to consult our membership. In addition, Partnerships (at least the co- programmed) have to deliver the Biennial Report by end of January, which could be one input to prepare more in details scenario(s) for the phasing-out. Shall we go rather for end of March as kind of a deadline for 1st draft of phasing-out strategy?
The development of a phasing-out strategy is an ex-ante criterion. For co-programmed partnerships, it should already be in place before the Horizon Europe mid-term evaluation (April 2025). The December draft already provides a postponed timeline